Two men from Sacramento sued a real estate company for failing to properly maintain their rental properties, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
The case comes a year after a California court ruled against a man who sued a property management company for not keeping up on rental-home prices.
The suit, filed in federal court in San Diego on behalf of David and David O’Reilly, contends that their rental property, the 6,200-square-foot home in San Francisco’s East Bay, is in a “significant financial distress.”
The O’Rices purchased the home in 2016 for $1.9 million.
Their lawyers have said they were not aware that the house was in foreclosure at the time they bought it, the Los Angeles Times reported.
The O’,Rices have been in a legal battle with the California Department of Land and Natural Resources for the past two years, arguing that the agency has been too slow to collect rent and other taxes on the property.
In February, the department filed a motion for an emergency stay that would prevent the agency from enforcing a requirement that the property owner maintain its property taxes and fees on the rental-housing stock.
The motion argued that it was not legally possible for the O’Rs to enforce the lease and rental-unit requirements, and therefore the O’,Rs were unable to collect the required taxes on their rental-units.
After the motion was denied in June, David O. O’Reillys attorneys filed another suit on the same grounds.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Barbara A. Jones ruled in favor of the ORIs.
She noted that the court had already issued a preliminary injunction barring the ORs from enforcing the lease requirements and also ordered the agency to continue collecting rent and interest on the mortgage.
“It is important to note that the OREs are not a ‘property-owners’ like tenants,” Jones wrote in her ruling.
“Their rental-leaseholds are ‘rental’ entities.”
In addition to the Oreills, a group of renters filed a separate lawsuit last year on behalf and against a property-management company in New Jersey, saying that the company did not maintain property-tax records, which could have led to a default.
More than 10 million people are in default on their mortgages, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
New skyscrapers are being built across the world in an effort to help drive the world economy.
But what’s behind it?
And what can we learn from what is happening around the world?
With so much going on around the globe, we decided to put the world’s cities to the test.
We asked our real estate experts to put their money where their mouth is.
We wanted to see how much bigger a city would get if it built its own skyscraper, as well as a hotel and office building.
We looked at the size of cities, including those in the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom.
The biggest city in the world is now in the hands of its own people.
So what does the future hold?
We’re happy to share the results.
The City of Melbourne, Australia, is home to 1.4 million people and has more than 100,000 buildings.
It was built with a mix of local and foreign companies, including real estate developers, banks and banks of Australia, Australia’s biggest bank.
This means that a large part of the city is built using local resources, and that’s a good thing.
It has the world-leading population of Sydney, which was built by the state government in partnership with private sector developers.
But the Melbourne metro area is also home to the world headquarters of Apple and the world centre for medical innovation, the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
The Sydney suburb of Westmead has the biggest population of the CBD, with about 100,500 residents, making it the most densely populated area in the country.
But it’s not just the size that matters.
The city’s population is also growing, but it’s largely driven by a boom in new housing.
The housing stock is now more than 50 per cent bigger than it was 20 years ago.
It’s also growing faster than other big cities around the country, such as London and Shanghai.
The result is that Melbourne is now home to more than 2 million people.
While this growth has meant that the city has more houses than ever before, it’s also driven by rapid population growth, with Melbourne’s population reaching 4 million by 2060.
That growth has been driven by the construction of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, the largest public works project in the city’s history.
In addition, Melbourne’s growing population is creating a housing crisis, with new residents coming to the city for the first time.
As the population rises, so too does the number of empty homes in the area.
But the problem is not just about people.
A city like Melbourne is also a place to live, to work and to play.
We know that the growth of the world, particularly in the developed world, has had a significant impact on the demand for housing.
That’s why it’s so important to have the right infrastructure to accommodate people, and we want to help build that infrastructure.
So how big is the city of Melbourne?
The city of Sydney is the largest city in Australia.
It is home, on average, to about 500,000 people, according to figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
That is bigger than the combined population of New York, Los Angeles, Boston and the city in Japan.
But this does not mean Sydney is home.
The median house price in the CBD is $1.7 million.
Melbourne is more expensive than most Australian cities, but that doesn’t mean it’s cheaper.
In fact, Sydney has one of the lowest median house prices in the continent, with the average price at just over $1 million.
In addition, it has the highest number of rental units in Australia at more than 1.8 million.
This means that Sydney has become the world capital for young professionals, and the new generation of workers in the financial sector, as the demand to live in the region increases.
The average age of a house in Sydney is 25 years, but the median age of someone living in Melbourne is just 22.
It also means that many of the new housing is affordable.
But it’s still a great place to start looking for a home.
What is a hotel?
A hotel is a small building that houses people who need to work in a certain location.
It can also be a hotel or other type of accommodation.
But a hotel isn’t a home for everybody, especially in a city like Sydney, where people can travel on a fixed-term lease.
This is especially true in the outer suburbs, where there is so much competition for jobs.
So what are the benefits of a hotel, and how do they compare to the cost of living?
A hotel is cheaper than renting.
There are two main reasons why hotels are cheaper than apartments.
Firstly, they are a lot more expensive.
There are also fewer people living in them.
A hotel typically has up to 40 rooms, but with a minimum occupancy of just 15, the maximum occupancy can be 30.
It makes it easier for